Teaching Materials
Ask a Master Teacher
Lesson Plan Gateway
Lesson Plan Reviews
State Standards
Teaching Guides
Digital Classroom
Ask a Digital Historian
Tech for Teachers
Beyond the Chalkboard
History Content
Ask a Historian
Beyond the Textbook
History Content Gateway
History in Multimedia
Museums and Historic Sites
National Resources
Quiz
Website Reviews
Issues and Research
Report on the State of History Education
Research Briefs
Roundtables
Best Practices
Examples of Historical Thinking
Teaching in Action
Teaching with Textbooks
Using Primary Sources
TAH Projects
Lessons Learned
Project Directors Conference
Project Spotlight
TAH Projects
About
Staff
Partners
Technical Working Group
Research Advisors
Teacher Representatives
Privacy
Quiz Rules
Blog
Outreach
Teaching History.org logo and contact info

Slavery in Wyoming

Photo, Wild Hog, Native American, Wyoming State Archives
Question 

Was slavery permitted in the area now known as southern Wyoming?

Answer 

It depends on the time period. As Wyoming did not become a state until 1890, then slavery would obviously have been illegal, as this was after the passage of the 13th Amendment in 1865. However, if the question refers to the legality of slavery in southern Wyoming in earlier times, then the answer must be a qualified 'yes.'

What became southeastern Wyoming was part of the French Colony of Louisiana between 1699 and 1764, when jurisdiction passed to the Spanish. Slavery was legal in Louisiana, under both the French and the Spanish at this time.

What became southeastern Wyoming was part of the French Colony of Louisiana between 1699 and 1764, when jurisdiction passed to the Spanish. Slavery was legal in Louisiana, under both the French and the Spanish at this time. However, the fact that slavery existed in Louisiana doesn't necessarily mean that the institution took root in Wyoming. Louisiana was a big place, so conditions that existed in St. Louis and New Orleans did not necessarily translate to Wyoming.

The purchase of Louisiana by the U.S. in 1803 did not change these conditions materially. Louisiana Territory was open to slavery, and, as we know, Lewis and Clark brought at least one slave—York—with them on their journey up the Missouri. The Territory of Missouri, established in 1812 and encompassing what came to be Wyoming east of the Continental Divide, also permitted slavery. However, the Missouri Compromise of 1821 outlawed slavery north of 36 degrees, 30 minutes latitude in remaining portions of the former Louisiana Territory. That settled the issue temporarily. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 erased the Missouri Compromise line and made slavery possible via the instrument of popular sovereignty. Later, the Civil War and 13th Amendment rendered that a moot point.

Slavery of and Among Native Americans

We need to remember that while the institution of slavery ultimately focused on African Americans, largely working on plantations (though certainly not entirely, particularly in the west), Native Americans were also enslaved. However, by the time the Spanish took over parts of present-day Wyoming in 1764, they had outlawed slavery of Native American peoples. In addition, there was also the capture and enslavement of conquered tribal communities among the Native Americans themselves. As an example, the Comanches certainly took Native American captives and engaged in a slave trade that linked the plains with Santa Fe, among other places in the Southwest. Some of those captives sold into slavery were Shoshone and Paiute peoples, who could have called southeastern Wyoming 'home.'

Bibliography 

Yes, indeed. Some American

Yes, indeed. Some American Indians in the US South did adopt aspects of the Southern plantation economy, including African American Slaves. As a general rule, Cherokee, Creek, Chickasaw and Choctaw slaveholders were members of an elite socio-economic strata who participated in the developing southern economy. Some were of mixed Indian-European stock, the children and grandchildren of white traders and government officials. But adoption of slavery was less a consequence of 'blood' than economic position, and in some cases religion. Many Indian slaveholders were christians, just like their non-Indian slaveholding neighbors.

Over time, the introduction of slavery into these societies led to increasingly diverse and complex populations, in the South and in Indian Territory.

With regard to the section

With regard to the section "slavery of and among Native Americans", is it not also accurate that in the American South, some Native Americans owned African-American slaves?

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <b> <i>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 
Content